A part designed for milling is rarely good for printing. DFAM means rethinking the geometry for the technology: lighter, stronger, with less material and no needless supports. I help you redesign so the print works for you.
The bracket that snaps along the layers: A part loaded across the layers splits at the first serious impact. The fix is rarely “more perimeters”: it is reorientation and geometry that respects anisotropy.
The housing with 14 print hours and 40% supports: The same function, rethought for printing, often drops below half the time: with no loss of strength.
The 6-part assembly that could be 2: Consolidation removes fasteners, tolerances and assembly: the advantage additive has that milling does not.
The rules that solve most of the problems
Orientation first: Layer direction defines strength, surface and supports alike.
Self-supporting geometry: Chamfers and teardrop holes instead of overhangs that demand supports.
Wall thickness matched to the nozzle: A wall that is a multiple of the extrusion width prints cleanly and predictably.
Function dictates density: Infill and perimeters are chosen by the load case, not by defaults.
Who it's for
Engineers and designers who want parts made for printing.
Request a consultation
Describe your case and I'll send you a quote. Price: on request.
FAQ
Need a CAD model?For the best result, yes. But we start from a sketch too.
Only looks?No. Function, weight, strength and cost.
Do you work with metal and SLS, or FDM only?DFAM principles are universal; the rules per technology differ: you name the technology, the analysis targets it.
What do I get physically?Written geometry recommendations with concrete changes: specific enough for your design engineer to apply directly.
We use cookies. Essential ones make the site work. With your consent we also use
analytics cookies (Google Analytics) to understand what is useful. See our
Privacy Policy.